Governance
How this project is run
Governance is public so contributors can see who decides, and how.
Roles
- Contributors open issues and pull requests under the Code of Conduct.
- Reviewers triage issues and review pull requests in their area.
- Maintainers merge changes, cut releases, and set direction.
How decisions are made
- Proposals start as an issue or a Discussion — never in a private channel.
- Maintainers seek rough consensus in public. Where consensus is not reached, the lead maintainer decides and records the rationale on the issue.
- Anything that changes the licence, the governance itself, or the public roadmap requires an announced decision with a comment period before it takes effect.
Maintainers
- Ashutosh Panigrahi — Founder & Lead Maintainer@ashutoshpanigrahi · Overall direction, model releases, governance
The full list lives on the maintainers page.
Becoming a maintainer
There is no fixed quota. A contributor who consistently lands good changes, reviews others' work fairly, and is reliable over time may be invited to become a reviewer, then a maintainer. If you are interested, say so in an issue and a current maintainer will help you find the right scope of responsibility.
Changing this document
Governance changes are made by pull request against this page, with an announcement in GitHub Discussions.